医学生场认知方式与自我妨碍的关系研究  

Research on the relationship between field cognition style and self-handicapping of medical students

作　　者：李妮娜[1] 徐华华 吉峰[1] 冯玉[1] 解卫功 

机构地区：[1]山东省济宁医学院精神卫生学院,山东省高校人文社会科学研究基地-“行为与健康”研究基地,济宁272067 [2]济宁医学院精神卫生学院2008级应用心理学专业 [3]山东省胶南滨海卫生院

出　　处：《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》2014年第6期550-552,共3页Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science

基　　金：济宁医学院2012年度校级教育科研计划项目

摘　　要：目的 探讨场认知方式与医学生自我妨碍的相关性.方法 采用镶嵌图形测验（EFT）、自我妨碍问卷（SHS）对某医学院124名医学生展开问卷调查.结果 ①医学生自我妨碍得分在是否喜欢所学专业方面差异有统计学意义,喜欢所学专业者自我妨碍得分低于不喜欢者[（33.61±5.21）分,（35.94±5.16）分,t=-0.218,P=0.031];获得奖学金者自我妨碍得分低于未获得者[（33.20±6.19）分,（35.12±4.12）分,t=-0.247,P=0.043];有男（女）朋友自我妨碍得分高于对照组[（35.35±5.48）分,（33.39±5.01）分,t=2.063,P=0.041].②场依存认知方式的医学生群体其自我妨碍得分高于场独立认知方式群体[（35.69±3.91）分,（32.63±6.08）分,t=3.303,P=0.001].③场依存认知方式、不喜欢所学专业、有男（女）朋友成绩对医学生学业自我妨碍有显著的预测作用.结论 场认知方式与自我妨碍存在相关性,场依存认知方式个体的自我妨碍倾向高于场独立认知方式的个体.Objective To explore the relationship between field cognitive style and self-handicapping of medical students.Methods 124 medical students were measured by embedded figure test （EFT） and self-handicapping questionnaire （SHS）.Results ①The scores of self-handicapping questionnaire were significantly different in whether they like their major or not（33.61±5.21,35.94±5.16,t=-0.218,P=0.031）.Differences were also found in whether they could obtain the scholarships （33.20±6.19,35.12±4.12,t=-0.247,P=0.043）,and in whether they were in a relationship（35.35±5.48,33.39±5.01,t=2.063,P=0.041）.②Compared with field-independent cognitive style students,Field-dependent cognitive style students＇ self-handicapping score was higher （35.69±3.91,32.63±6.08,t=3.303,P=0.001）.③Field-dependent cognitive style,dislike their major and be in a relationship were the significant predictors of self-handicapping.Conclusion Correlation exists between field cognitive style and self-handicapping of the medical students.Students who belong to field-dependent cognitive style are more prone to self-handicapping than field-independent cognitive style students.

关 键 词：场认知方式 自我妨碍 医学生 

分 类 号：R395[哲学宗教—心理学]