老年听力障碍量表筛查版与完整版结果对比分析  

Comparison of HHIE and HHIE-s Results in People over 70 Years of Age

作　　者：韩莹[1] 周其友[1] 冀飞[1] 

机构地区：[1]解放军总医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,北京100853

出　　处：《中华耳科学杂志》2014年第2期250-252,共3页Chinese Journal of Otology

基　　金：解放军总医院临床科研扶持基金(2012FC-TSYS-3056);军队医药卫生科研基金课题(11BJZ33);全军军事医学计量科研专项课题(2012-JL1-028);解放军总医院科技创新苗圃基金(12KMM29;13KMM14)

摘　　要：目的对比老年听力障碍量表完整版(HHIE)与筛查版(HHIE-S)调查问卷结果,探讨更便捷的功能性听力障碍筛检方法。方法对120例70岁以上老年人分别进行老年听力障碍量表HHIE和HHIE-S的问卷调查,对比各自听力障碍分级标准,分别得出听力障碍等级结论。将HHIE结果与HHIE-S结果进行比较。结果根据HHIE功能性听力障碍分级标准,完整版有41例存在听力障碍,其中轻中度24例,重度17例。HHIE-S结果显示39例存在听力障碍,其中轻中度27例,重度12例。HHIE和HHIE-S的功能性听力障碍分级结果无统计学差异(X2=1.064,P=0.588)。结论老年听力障碍量表筛查版(HHIE-S)可以代替完整版进行临床调查,更便于患者信息采集及临床应用。Objective To compare the results between Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly （HHIE） and its screening version （HHIE-S） in elderly people over 70 years of age with hearing handicap. Methods One hundred and twenty people over 70 years participated in the survey using HHIE or HHIE-S respectively. Hearing function handicap scores from HHIE and HHIE-S were compared. Results HHIE scores identified 41 subjects with hearing function handicap （mild-to-mod-erate in 24 and maximum in 17）. In comparison, HHIE-S identified 39 subjects with hearing function handicap （mild-to-mod-erate in 27 and maximum in 12）. No significant difference was found between the results from HHIE and HHIE-S （X2=1.064, P=0.588）. Conclusion HHIE-S can be used as a convenient screening tool in investigating hearing handicap in elderly peo-ple, with similar validity as HHIE.

关 键 词：功能性听力障碍 问卷 老年 

分 类 号：R764.432[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科] R764.436[医药卫生—临床医学]