冲击地压现场监测方法分析与选择原则  

Analysis and Selection Principle of Rock Burst Field Monitoring Methods

作　　者：王同旭[1] 刘文杰[1] 刘钒[1,2] 闫相宏[1,3] 

机构地区：[1]山东科技大学矿业与安全工程学院,山东青岛266590 [2]山东省煤炭工业局,山东济南250031 [3]尤洛卡矿业安全工程股份有限公司,山东泰安271000

出　　处：《山东科技大学学报（自然科学版）》2014年第3期43-47,共5页Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Natural Science)

基　　金：山东省优秀中青年科学家科研奖励基金项目(BS2011NJ014)

摘　　要：冲击地压现场监测有许多种方法,如何根据不同矿井及煤层特点选择合适的现场监测方法与仪器设备,是工程实际中的难题之一。在大量调研的基础上,对各种监测方法的原理、仪器设备、优缺点及适用条件进行对比分析,按冲击危险区域类别(点域、局域、区域)将各种现场监测方法进行分类,给出了不同监测方法选择的依据;同时分析多种方法联合监测、综合分析的必要性,给出不同条件下合理组合的建议,并通过对不同特点冲击矿井的综合监测方法的应用效果进行了验证。最后,提出了综合监测时不同监测方法所监测结果的处理建议。The choice of suitable field monitoring method and equipment in agreement with the specific mining condition has remained a challenging problem. Based on adequate investigation, this paper analyzed the multiple elements in the above choice making. The existing field monitoring methods were classified according to the rock burst fatalness area category （point domain,local and regional area） and the selecting principle was summarized. The necessity of joint monitoring and comprehensive analysis was favorably suggested. Through application test, the comprehensive monitoring methods in rock burst mines were verified. Finally suggestions were put forward to deal with the comprehensive monitoring results.

关 键 词：冲击地压 监测方法 对比分析 合理组合 

分 类 号：TD324[矿业工程—矿井建设]