检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京大学公共卫生学院卫生政策与管理学系,北京100191
出 处:《北京大学学报(医学版)》2014年第3期450-454,共5页Journal of Peking University:Health Sciences
基 金:北京市高等学校青年英才计划(YETP0058)资助~~
摘 要:目的:探索社会决定因素对北京市老年人生命质量的影响。方法:采用问卷法,对1 685位北京户籍60岁及以上老年人进行入户调查。使用EQ-5D量表测量老年人生命质量,使用TTO效用模型计算健康指数;采用多重线性回归和Logistic回归模型,分析社会决定因素与老年人生命质量状况的关系。结果:北京城市与农村户籍老年人的生命质量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);受教育程度和经济水平越高,老年人生命质量状况越好;不同受教育程度、经济水平和婚姻状态的老年人在行动、自我照顾、活动、疼痛和不适、焦虑沮丧等生命质量5个子维度上的表现有差异(P<0.05)。结论:对于北京市城乡低收入、低教育水平的老年人群需要更多政策关怀。Objective:To verify the association between social determinants and the quality of life ( QoL) among the elderly in Beijing .Methods:A questionnaire household survey was conducted and 1 685 over 60 dwellers in Beijing were interviewed .The EQ-5D scale was used to measure the elderly ’ s QoL and Time Trade-off model was used to calculate the EQ-5D index.Multiple linear regression and Logistic regression were employed to analyze the association between social determinants and the QoL .Results:There was no statistical significant difference in the QoL between the urban and the rural residents ( P〉0 .05 ) .The elderly with higher education level and income or married tended to have higher overall QoL scoresand better performance of five dimensions of the QoL (P〈0.05).Conclusion:More policies should be focused on the elderly with lower social determinants in both urban and rural areas in Beijing .
分 类 号:R19[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.233