检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王岩[1] 马文泽 李玉霞[3] 王桂琦[4] 温亚彬 马朋羽[3]
机构地区:[1]河北省石家庄市第一医院微创外科,河北石家庄050011 [2]河北省栾城县医院麻醉科,河北栾城051430 [3]河北省石家庄市第一医院麻醉科,河北石家庄050011 [4]河北省石家庄市第一医院腺体外科,河北石家庄050011 [5]河北省栾城县中医院普外科,河北栾城051430
出 处:《河北医科大学学报》2014年第6期654-657,共4页Journal of Hebei Medical University
摘 要:目的探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜上消化道穿孔修补术的临床应用价值。方法回顾分析50例经脐单孔腹腔镜上消化道穿孔修补术与50例传统腹腔镜下上消化道穿孔修补术临床资料,对比分析2组手术时间、气腹时间、术后肠蠕动恢复时间、住院时间、术中出血量、术后应用镇痛药物情况、切口感染及术后随访情况。结果经脐单孔腹腔镜组在手术时间、气腹时间、术中出血量、术后肠蠕动恢复时间、应用镇痛药物均少于对照组(P<0.01),而2组切口感染率、住院时间差异无统计学意义。结论经脐单孔腹腔镜上消化道穿孔修补术安全可靠,值得在临床推广应用。Objective To investigate the clinic application of transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic surgery in treatment of upper digestive tract perforation. Methods By reviewing and analyzing the clinic data of transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic( 50 cases ) and traditional laparoscopic( 50 case ),the operation time,pneumoperitoneum time,postoperative intestinal peristalsis recovery time,hospitalization time,intraoperative bleeding volume,postoperative analgesia,wound infection rate,and postoperative follow-up survey of two groups were compared. Results The observation group was better in the aspects of operation time,pneumoperitoneum time,bleeding volume,recovery time of intestinal peristalsis,application of analgesic drugs than the control group(P〈0. 01),but the wound infection rate,hospitalization time showed no significant difference between two groups. Conclusion Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic surgery in the upper digestive tract perforation repair is safe and feasible. It is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145