论我国环境保证金制度及其合法性问题  

On China's Environmental Security Deposit System and Its Legitimacy Issue

作　　者：吴卫星[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学法学院,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《河海大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2014年第2期78-82,92,共5页Journal of Hohai University：Philosophy and Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(09CFX051);江苏省法学会法学研究课题(SFH2013B01);南京大学985三期项目

摘　　要：环境保证金制度是我国各地为了加强环境法的实施效果而推出的创新性政策手段,但大多涉嫌违反法律保留原则与比例原则。为此,应当通过立法尤其是通过修订《环境保护法》将保证金正式确立为环境保护的一项新型制度。在保证金制度设计上要兼顾公益与私益、行政目的与行政手段之间的平衡,建立包括保证金在内的多元化的环境行政的担保方式。The environmental security deposit system is an innovative policy which focuses on enhancing the effect of the implementation of China' s environmental law. But it violates the principle of legal reservation and the principle of proportionality. Therefore, it is compulsory to officially establish a new system of environmental protection through legislation, especially through amendments to the Environmental Protection Act. It is necessary to take the balance between public and private interests,administrative purposes and administrative means into account. China should establish diverse guarantee means of environmental administration,including security deposit.

关 键 词：行政担保 环境保证金 法律保留 比例原则 

分 类 号：D922.6[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]