检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴金菊[1] 胡明霞[1] 吴思远[1] 尤恩情[1] 赵科伕[1] 李玮[1]
机构地区:[1]合肥市疾病预防控制中心,安徽合肥230061
出 处:《安徽预防医学杂志》2014年第3期160-162,共3页Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine
摘 要:目的分析安徽省合肥市医疗机构传染病报告情况,为规范传染病报告工作提出相应对策。方法采用普查和抽样调查相结合的方法选取调查对象,针对医疗机构传染病报告质量,设计18个项目,分别赋予分值,共100分,进行综合评估。结果合肥市医疗机构总体报告质量较好,平均得分为93.39分,其中抽查乙丙类传染病21种11 761例,报告11 525例,报告率为97.99%,及时报告率为99.23%;县级以上医疗机构和乡镇卫生院报告率差异无统计学意义(χ2=3.21,P>0.05);不同县区的传染病报告质量有所不同。结论合肥市总体传染病报告质量较好,部分地区报告质量较低,需加强培训和监管力度,进一步提高传染病报告管理工作水平。Objective To analyze notifiable communicable diseases report quality of hospitals in Hefei and provide basis for improving communicable disease report. Methods All hospitals at municipal and county level, township hospitals and community health centers selected by sampling method were investigated. Communicable disease report quality was conducted by questionnaire. Results Communicable disease report quality of hospitals in Hefei was good. Average score was 93. 39 points. 11 761 cases from 21 kinds of communicable diseases including B and C class were investigated. Of them, 11 525 cases were reported. The report rate was 97.99% and timely report rate was 99.23%. There were no significant differences of communicable disease report quality between hospitals at different levels. ( chi - square = 3.21 ,P 〉 0.05 ). But there were significant differences of the report quality between different counties. Conclusion General communicable disease report quality was good. But the report quality in some parts was lower. In order to improve communicable disease report quality and management, the training and supervision should be strengthened further.
分 类 号:R19[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30