无居民海岛使用权阐释:海洋属性与海权发展  

On the Usufruct in Uninhabited Islands in Perspective of Oceanic Nature and Development of Sea Power

作　　者：马得懿[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学国际航运法律学院,上海201620

出　　处：《河北法学》2014年第7期107-117,共11页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：国家社会科学基金资助项目<无居民海岛使用权研究>(12BFX130);教育部人文社会科学研究资助项目<无居民海岛使用权属的理论与实践探讨>(12YJA820047)阶段性成果

摘　　要：在自然资源物权化倍受争议的背景和语境下考察无居民海岛使用权,只有在不同的逻辑进路下予以系统化和体系化的展开,才可能具有合理性。准物权和生态化下的无居民海岛使用权都存有法理上的不足。在"体系后研究范式"之下,无居民海岛使用权的公权属性颇为明显,尽管无居民海岛使用权的法律属性具有复杂性和独立性,但是其具有公私法兼备的混合权利的属性亦是情理之中。无居民海岛的海洋属性决定了在海权发展的逻辑进路理解和阐释无居民海岛使用权是可行的。系统地审视无居民海岛使用权的法律属性,不仅是厘清无居民海岛使用权的基础性问题的需要,而且在弘扬海洋意识和诠释财产权与国家主权的可通约性方面具有相当的法学意义。There is rationality to suggest that probing usufruct in uninhabited island would be systematical upon which be in perspective of different views, such as context and background of usufructuary natural resources. Where usufruct in uninhabited islands be not a single private right, but a composite rights, would be clearly defects in legal principle in condition that taking such right as a quasi-real right or a ecological real right in the construction of a new study mode after the formation of our legal system, although it is independence and complexity. It is obvious that the usufruct in uninhabited islands be a public rights, which originates from oceanic resources. Also it is feasible and distinct legal significance of that recognizing the legal natural concerning the usufruct in uninhabited islands, by means of logical approach of development of sea power in our country, which be not only a demand on making clear of basic legal issues, but also a legal explanation of commensurability between property right and national sovereignty, and promoting the our national oceanic awareness.

关 键 词：无居民海岛使用权 海洋属性 海权发展 混合权利 可通约性 

分 类 号：D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]