后棱镜时代的国际网络治理——从美国拟移交对ICANN的监管权谈起  

International Network Governance after the Reveal of PRISM——Start from the US's schedule turning the custodial powers over

作　　者：崔聪聪[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京邮电大学法律系,北京100876

出　　处：《河北法学》2014年第8期26-33,共8页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目<国家网络空间安全法律保障机制研究>(13&ZD181)的阶段性成果;北京高等学校青年英才计划项目(YETP0464)

摘　　要：美国已建立起一整套涵盖网络空间战略、法律、军事和技术保障的网络防控体系。美国对ICANN的监管权的移交不会导致其丧失对互联网的实际控制权。自上而下的方法不是互联网国际治理的最优解决方案,互联网治理需要利益相关方的共同参与。美国提出的"多利益相关方模式"是其单边主义以及先发制人战略在网络空间的延伸,是对主权国家信息主权的不当溶蚀。为建立和平与公正的网络空间国际秩序,应设立网络安全与发展委员会,并将其纳入到联合国框架。互联网的国际治理应遵循主权平等原则和相对安全观,并充分发挥政府的主导作用。The United States of America had already set up a network control system involving cyberspace strategy, law, military and technique. It will not lose the de facto control though it turn over the custodial powers of ICANN. Down-up model is not the best resolution in respect to International network governance , instead the participation of all interests parties may be better. The ＂ multilateral partnership＂ mode came up by US is a sign in the cyberspace of its unilateralism and preemptive strategy, and would impact the information sovereignty of independent sovereign countries. What we should do is to establish a ＂Internet security and development committee＂ , and include it to the UN, to develop peaceful and impartial international cyberspace order. International network governance must in conformity with the rule of sovereign equality and relative set.urity outlook , and underscore the government＇s leading role.

关 键 词：网络安全 信息主权 网络空间国际秩序 相对安全观 国际网络治理 

分 类 号：D5[政治法律—政治学]