环境修复的司法裁量  

Judicial Discretion of Environmental Restoration

作　　者：李挚萍[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学法学院

出　　处：《中国地质大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第4期20-27,139,共8页Journal of China University of Geosciences(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家法治与法学理论研究项目"环境修复法律机制研究"(12SFB2058)

摘　　要：环境修复是针对环境损害所提供的法律救济,其目的是通过责令造成环境损害的责任人采取环境综合整治措施恢复受到损害的环境的功能和价值。近十年来随着环境公益诉讼和环境刑事案件的增多,环境修复这一法律救济形式才进入法院司法裁判的范畴。本文通过对近年来涉及环境修复的司法判例的考察,认为法院关于环境修复救济措施的探索对于丰富环境司法实践、完善环境损害救济很有积极意义。但是法院做出的环境修复决定也存在着法律依据欠准确,标准不统一,责任方式、修复目标和方案缺乏指引等问题,故认为为了改进环境修复的法律实践,必须完善环境修复立法、标准、程序和协调机制。Environmental restoration is a relief provided for environmental damage by means of ordering the responsible person to take comprehensive environmental control measures to restore the function and value of the damaged environment caused by them.In recent years,with the rise of environmental public interest litigation and environmental criminal cases,environment restoration as a legal relief enters into the category of judicial discretion.The related judicial cases show that the environmental restoration judicial practice has positive effect on the enrichment of environmental judicial practice and the remediation of environmental damage.But the judicial practice is plagued by serious problems,such as lack of legal basis of liability,disunity of technology standards,implementation scheme of environmental restoration etc.Based on the research of existing environmental restoration judicial decisions,this paper analyzes key issues of enforcement of environmental restoration in the judicial practice,trying to propose some suggestions of perfecting the environmental restoration legislative and judicial practice.

关 键 词：环境修复 司法救济 司法裁量 

分 类 号：D922.680.1[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]