检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《国际经贸探索》2014年第7期18-24,共7页International Economics and Trade Research
摘 要:人们普遍将"比较利益陷阱"归因于国际政治经济学的依附理论,过分地强调了新自由主义经济理论的负面效应,从而使得比较优势原理本身的缺陷动摇了其对于发展中国家的适用性。研究认为,这种对"比较利益陷阱"病因的诊断并不正确,它只看到了发展中国家在自由贸易中的损失,并没有注意到贸易所带来的更多的利益,更重要的是忽视了经济自由所导致的比较优势的动态变化。而"比较利益陷阱"真正原因并不是经济自由的危害性,反倒是没有充分利用经济自由的力量将比较优势转化为竞争优势,这主要表现在发展中国家广泛存在着企业家精神的缺失与制度上的后发劣势。People generally attribute "comparative advantage trap" to the dependency theory of international political economy, with too much emphasis on the negative effect of neo-liberal economic theory, so that the defect of comparative advantage principle has shaken its applicability for developing countries. Studies show that such a cause diagnosis for "comparative advantage trap" is not correct, because it only sees the losses brought by the free trade to developing countries, but have not noticed the more benefits brought by it. More importantly, it has ignored the economic freedom caused by the dynamic changes in comparative advantage. The real cause of "comparative advantage trap" is not the danger of economic freedom, but rather the insufficient use of the power of economic freedom to transfer comparative advantages into competitive advantages, which is mainly embodied on the lack of entrepreneurship and the latecomer disadvantage of institution in developing countries.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30