检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学法律硕士学院,北京100088 [2]湖南大学法学院,长沙410082
出 处:《中国卫生法制》2014年第4期13-16,共4页China Health Law
摘 要:依最高人民法院《关于审理非法行医刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》规定,个人未取得《医疗机构执业许可证》开办医疗机构的行为应认定为《刑法》第三百三十六条第一款规定的"未取得医生执业资格的人非法行医",即在个体行医的场合下,医师必须取得《医疗机构执业许可证》,方能开展诊疗活动,否则便属于非法行医。然而,非个体行医的情形下,医师在无执业许可证的医疗机构行医,是否属于非法行医?对此,法律并无相关规定,本文对此类案件所涉医师是否属于刑法规定的"未取得医生执业资格的人"进行探讨。The second section of the first article of the Supreme Court's Several Issues About the Specific Application of Law in the Trial of Criminal Cases of Illegal Medical Practice in Interpretation regulates person who setsup a medical institution but without a practice license of medical institution will be considered as such person whoworks as a doctor illegally without the qualification for practicing medicine, which is ruled by criminal law in Articlefirst paragraph 336th. It refers that private doctors should get the institute license first to provide medical service.Otherwise, his or her behavior will be considered as the illegal medical practice. However, in the case of licenseddoctor practicing in unregistered medical institution, will the doctor's medical behavior be considered to be illegal?The law did not give answer of this scene. The paper will focus on whether the doctor in this case belong to "a person who works as a doctor illegally without the qualification for practicing" which is ruled by criminal law or not.
关 键 词:非法行医 主体 医师执业资格 医疗机构执业许可证
分 类 号:R197[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15