检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邹献中[1] 陈勇[1] 刘辉[1] 许桂芝[1] 欧俊[1] 杨少海[1]
机构地区:[1]广东省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所,农业部南方植物营养与肥料重点实验室,广东省养分资源循环利用与耕地保育重点实验室,广州510640
出 处:《土壤学报》2014年第4期860-867,共8页Acta Pedologica Sinica
基 金:广东省财政专项资金项目(粤财农[2013]563号;[2012]471号);广东省科技厅科技攻关项目(2012B030800007);广东省农业科学院博士启动基金资助
摘 要:研究了SO2-4添加顺序对三种可变电荷土壤(昆明铁质砖红壤、徐闻砖红壤和江西红壤)吸附Cu2+的影响,作为对照,也研究了其对恒电荷土壤(黄棕壤、棕壤)以及两种不同矿物(高岭石与针铁矿)吸附铜离子的影响。实验结果表明,在同等条件下,SO2-4添加顺序对两类表面性质不同的土壤吸附Cu2+有着不同的影响。对于恒电荷土壤,SO2-4添加顺序对土壤吸附Cu2+几乎没有影响。同等pH条件下,对可变电荷表面而言,加入CuSO4者具有最高的Cu2+吸附率;对昆明砖红壤、徐闻砖红壤以及针铁矿和高岭石而言,先加入Cu2+者相对先加入SO2-4者Cu2+吸附率更高;对江西红壤而言,上述这个次序则刚好相反。SO2-4浓度和有机质去除对同等pH条件下铜离子吸附率高低的排序并无实质性影响。To investigate effect of sequence of sulfate addition on adsorption of Cu2+ by soils, samples of variable charge soils (Ali-Haplic Acrisol from Jinxian, Rhodic from Xuwen and Hyper-Rhodic from Kunming) , constant charge soils ( Haplic Luvisol from Nanjiug and Brown soil from Weihai) , geothite and kaolinite were used in the experiment. All the samples, except kaolinite, were treated with electrodialysis. Copper ion was spiked at a rate of 1 cmol L-1, and sulfate at a rate of 0. 1 cmol L-1 and 1 cmol L-1, separately. The experiment was designed to have three treatments in sequence, that is, Treatment 1 : addition of copper nitrate, stand, vibration and addition of sulfate; Treatment 2: addition of copper sulfate and nitrate the same time, stand and vibration; and Treatment 3 : addition of sulfate, stand, vibration and addition of copper nitration. All the samples were treated to keep copper ions and sulfate the same in concentration in the suspensions before vibration in the end. Soil pH of the samples was measured with glass electrodes, and copper ions measured with Atomic Adsorption Spectrometry. Results show that the effect of sequence of sulfate addition on Cu~~ adsorption by soils varied from soil to soil different in surface charge properties. For constant charge soils, the sequence of sulfate addition did not have much effect on Cu2+ adsorption. On the other hand, among the three treatments, when pH was kept the same, variable charge soils, kaolinite and goethite in Treatment 2 were the highest in Cu2+ adsorption rate. For All - Haplic Acrisol, the samples in Treatment 3 were higher than those in Treatment 1 in Cu2+ adsorption rate. For Hyper-Rhodic Ferrasol, Rhodic Ferrasol, kaolinite and geothite, the effect was just the opposite to that on Ali-Haplic Acrisol when they were under the same condition. No matter on what samples, application rate of sulfate did not have any effect on the order of the treatments in Cu: ~ adsorption rate, and a similar phenomenon was observed when Hyper-
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13