检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]苏州大学政治与公共管理学院,江苏苏州215006
出 处:《江苏行政学院学报》2014年第4期94-98,共5页The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute
基 金:国家社科基金项目"微博政治参与的效度及维稳长效机制建构"(13BZZ069)的阶段性成果
摘 要:作为协商的民主治理模式与维护社会政治稳定具有内在一致性,它体现出新时期国家治理从高压管控向平等协商的转型趋势。多元社会和利益分化引发的分裂与对立对稳定局面带来越来越严峻的挑战。在维稳实践中,需要走出传统维稳模式的怪圈,以巩固党和政府执政的合法性基础。在全面深化改革的新时期,维稳工作必须转变治理思路,推进协商民主广泛多层制度化发展,以协商民主新思维包容利益诉求和规范利益均衡。从理论和实践上走出传统维稳模式的悖论,构建一元主导、多中心互动治理的维稳长效机制,有利于政府改进社会治理方式、提高治理能力,有利于化解社会矛盾冲突和维护社会政治长期稳定。As a form of deliberative mechanism, this model of democratic governance has internal consistency with the task of maintaining social and political stability. It reflects the shift from high pressure control to equal consultation in governance in the new era. The division and confrontation caused by pluralistic society and differentiation of interests have posed severe challenge for stability. It is necessary to step out of the plight of traditional practice in maintaining stability to consolidate the basis of legitimacy for the ruling party and the government. In the new era of comprehensively deepening of reform, stability task must change the thinking of governance, promote the multi-leveled development of deliberative democ-acy in a wide range, so as to contain interest demand and regulate interest balance with the thinking of deliberative democracy. The traditional paradox of maintaining of stability must be broken both in theory and in practice. It is urgent to build the long-term stability mechanism dominated with one core and supported with interaction from various centers. This is con- structive for the government to improve social governance, increase governance capacity, resolve social conflicts and maintain long-term social and political stability.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.92