检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《情报学报》2001年第1期66-72,共7页Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information
基 金:到国家 8 63项目资助 !项目编号 :863 30 6 0 4 0 2 0 2
摘 要:自动文摘系统作为一种信息压缩精选工具 ,越来越引起人们广泛的兴趣。但是 ,目前仍未有一种客观公认的评价方法来对已有的系统进行评价 ,从而极大地阻碍了自动文摘领域的研究。本文首先阐述了自动文摘系统评价所面临的问题 ,随后综述了当前国内外自动文摘的评价方法 。In such an era of information explosion, more and more people are interested in the field of automatic summarization which can serve as a kind of information refining tools. However, there isn't an objective evaluation method that could be accepted by the majority of researchers, so, the lack of evaluation method becomes a big obstacle for study of automatic summarizing. In this paper, the problems facing with the evaluation of automatic summarizing systems were introduced. Then, many evaluation methods used in the field were reviewed. At last, a kind of evaluation method referred to the Turing Testing was introduced and practiced.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229