人工流产即时放置吉妮致美与Tcu220效果观察  

Observation of placement of Jenefox and Tcu220 following artificial abortion

作　　者：王海平 

机构地区：[1]北京市密云县妇幼保健院妇产科,北京101500

出　　处：《中国妇幼健康研究》2014年第3期539-540,共2页Chinese Journal of Woman and Child Health Research

摘　　要：目的观察人流术后即时放置不同结构宫内节育器(IUD)的效果。方法选择人流术后自愿即时放置宫内节育器育龄妇女,随机分为两组,其中放置吉妮致美者386例(吉妮组),放置Tcu220者352例(Tcu220组),记录两组术后一年带器妊娠,脱落,因症取出等情况。结果吉妮组与Tcu220组人流术后放置失败率分别为0.78%和0.57%,两组比较无显著差异(x～2=0.01,P>0.05)。吉妮组放置后带器妊娠率、脱落率和因症取出率均显著低于Tcu220组,差异有统计学意义(x～2值分别为0.01、4.62、6.99,均P<0.05),而吉妮组续用率显著高于Tcu220组,两组比较存在显著差异(x～2=31.37,P<0.01)。结论人流术后即时放置吉妮致美宫内节育器更为高效、安全。Objective To observe and compare the effect of placement of two different structured intrauterine device （ IUD ） following artificial abortion .Methods Women of childbearing age who wished inserting IUD following artificial abortion were selected , and they were randomly assigned into two groups：386 cases with Jenefox in Jeneforx group and 352 cases with Tcu in Tcu group .Patient pregnancy rate with device of IUD , removal and expulsion after abortion within one year were recorded for two groups .Results The probability of failure placement of Jenefox group and Tcu group was 0.78% and 0.57%, respectively, and there was no significant difference between two groups （χ^2 =0.01, P〉0.05）.The pregnancy rate, removal rate and expulsion rate were significantly lower in Jenefox group than in Tcu group （χ^2 value was 0.01, 4.62 and 6.99, respectively, all P〈0.05）, but the continuation rate was significantly high in Jenefox group than Tcu group （χ^2 =31.37, P〈0.01）.Conclusion Placement of Jenefox following artificial abortion is relatively more safe and effective .

关 键 词：人工流产 宫内节育器 带器妊娠率 脱落率 

分 类 号：R711.7[医药卫生—妇产科学]