检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]辽宁省建筑设计研究院岩土工程公司,辽宁沈阳110005 [2]辽宁省建设科学研究院,辽宁沈阳110005
出 处:《水利与建筑工程学报》2014年第3期17-22,共6页Journal of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering
摘 要:现行设计规范一般将三维基坑问题简化为二维平面应变问题进行分析计算,不能反映基坑的空间效应。通过数值模拟,将FLAC3D模拟数据与经典法、弹性法比对,找出三维状态下桩锚支护结构的应力以及受力特点。结果表明:对于基坑内侧受拉的负弯矩,等值梁法更为准确,弹性法与模拟值相差较大;悬臂状态时,等值梁法能更为准确反映受力情况等。Current design codes usually make the deep excavation problem which is a 3-D space structure system simpli-fied as a 2-D plane strain problem to calculate and analyze ,which could not reflect the spatial effect .Through the nu-merical simulation ,the FLAC3D simulation data was compared with the classic method and elastic method to identify the characteristics of the stress and forcing for the pile-anchor support structure under the 3-D condition .The results suggest that for the negative moment suffering the tension inside the excavation ,the equivalent beam method is more accurate , but the elastic method is very different from the simulation ;For the cantilever state ,the equivalent beam method can more accurately reflect the forcing and so on .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.185.110