检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湖州市中国人民解放军第98医院急诊科,浙江湖州313000
出 处:《医学综述》2014年第11期2108-2109,共2页Medical Recapitulate
摘 要:目的观察地佐辛注射液对胆绞痛患者的疗效及不良反应。方法将湖州市中国人民解放军第98医院2010年1月至2013年3月收治的90例急性胆绞痛患者依据随机数字表法分为三组,各30例,三组分别给予地佐辛10 mg(地佐辛10 mg组)、7.5 mg(地佐辛7.5 mg组)、5 mg(地佐辛5 mg组),均联合阿托品注射液1 mg。用药后30 min后对比三组的临床疗效及不良反应情况。结果地佐辛7.5 mg组和地佐辛10 mg组的镇痛效果优于地佐辛5 mg组,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);地佐辛7.5 mg组与地佐辛5 mg组不良反应发生率均低于地佐辛10 mg组,差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.648,8.523,P<0.05)。结论地佐辛治疗急性胆绞痛时,应用7.5 mg镇痛疗效确切,不良反应少,值得临床推广应用。Objective To observe efficacy and adverse reactions of dezocine in treatment of biliary colic. Methods A total of 90 patients with acute biliary colic admitted to Huzhou PLA 98th Hospital from Jan. 2010 to Mar. 2013 were randomly divided into 3 groups,30 cases in each group. The three groups was given dezocine 10 mg,7.5 mg,5 mg respectively, and all combined with 1 mg atropine. After 30 min, the clinical analgesic effect and adverse reactions of the three groups were compared. Results The analgesic effect with assist symplectic of 7.5 mg group 5 mg group were superior to the ground with 10 mg group, compare the difference was statistically significant( P 〈 0.05 ) ;the incidence of adverse reactions of 7.5 mg group and 5 mg group were lower than to assist 10 mg group,difference was statistically significant(x2 =6.648, 8. 523 ,P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion 7.5 mg dezocine is worth popularizing for its effective analgesia and less adverse reactions in treatment of acute biliary colic.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117