检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:米铁男[1]
出 处:《河南大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年第4期59-66,共8页Journal of Henan University(Social Sciences)
基 金:北京邮电大学青年科研创新计划专项课题"网络犯罪刑法评价体系的构造研究"(24820132013RC0709)阶段性成果
摘 要:中国的纯正计算机犯罪以行为犯和结果犯为基本架构,在行为预防阶段和法益保护程度上分别存在不同的价值取向,这决定了中国当前计算机犯罪的立法模式。随着计算机网络技术的发展,计算机犯罪也呈现出新的发展趋势,国际上也越来越重视个人的网络权利。在这样的情形下,中国应该重新审视传统刑法理论,完善计算机犯罪的结构,构建涵盖行为犯、危险犯和结果犯的罪刑体系,凸显对个人法益的保护,适时降低起刑点。Pure computer crimes in China are classified into behavioral offence and consequential offence as basis frames and there are different orientations between the behavior prevention stage and legal interests' protection degree separately, determining the legislative mode of computer crimes in China today. As the development of computer internet technology, computer crimes have demonstrated a fresh developing trend and also the international peers pay more attention to individual internet right. Under such circumstances, China should reexamine traditional criminal law theory, improve the structure of computer crimes and build crimes and criminal sanctions system including behavioral offence, dangerous offence and consequential offence, highlighting the protection of individual legal interests and timely reducing starting point for criminal punishment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33