检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:门永生[1,2] 朱朝阳[1] 于振[1] 王丽[3]
机构地区:[1]中国电力科学研究院,北京100192 [2]北京科技大学土木与环境工程学院,北京100083 [3]天津理工大学环境科学与安全工程学院,天津300384
出 处:《安全与环境学报》2014年第3期84-87,共4页Journal of Safety and Environment
基 金:国家电网公司科技项目(JYYBGKJ[2013]133)
摘 要:为了提高电网设施在自然灾害和人为破坏等突发事件下的灾害应对能力,结合电力系统应急管理行业特点,从预防、准备、响应和恢复4个阶段构建了电网基础设施突发事件应急能力评价指标体系,共3个层次,包括4个一级指标、14个二级指标及30个三级指标,利用层次分析法确定了各级指标权重。并以某变电站为例,利用上述指标体系进行定量评价,借鉴国外标准,将应急能力划分为优秀、良好、一般和差4个等级,基于多级模糊综合评判法,得出其应急能力等级属于"良好",基本符合实际状况。The paper is aimed to propose an evaluation index system of the emergency response competence of our power system on how to enhance the infrastructure of the power supply while taking into account the particular features of the power industry and the emergency management process (it can be divided into four stages, that is, prevention, preparedness, response and recovery). It is just for the said purpose that we have developed an index system of three levels, including four top-rank indexes, the fourteen second-rank indexes and thirty third-rank indicators while studying the analytic hierarchical process for evaluating the weight of each index. In doing so, we have also worked out the evaluation matrixes by way of one-to-one comparison of the indicators from the basic ranks in correspondence with the indicators of the higher levels, with the elements of the matrix given according to the 1-9 scale number of Satty. To make our evaluation system more realistic and valuable for practical applications, we have invited about 100 experts to accomplish and enhance the evaluation matrix, including the management and the technical force from the electric power grid companies and enterprises, the administrative and managerial stuff members from the corresponding departments and research institutions engaged in emergency and disaster prevention. Through consistent investigation and level arrangement in an order, we have determined the weight of each indicator. And, finally, we have chosen and made a power-transformation substation in Guangdong as our case study sample to apply the index system established above by using a multi-level fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. Referring to the foreign evaluation standard, we have divided the emergency response capability into four grades, that is, excellent, good, moderate and weak. The experts mentioned above were invited to conduct an assessment and mark the performance grade on every indicator, with the fuzzy comprehensive judgment matrix being set up. Through a series of
关 键 词:安全管理 电网基础设施 应急能力 评价指标体系 层次分析法 模糊综合评判法
分 类 号:X921[环境科学与工程—安全科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222