检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周颖[1]
机构地区:[1]辽宁中医药大学附属医院,辽宁沈阳110032
出 处:《辽宁中医药大学学报》2014年第7期62-64,共3页Journal of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:该实验研究黄柏和苍术的不同提取、配伍方法。方法:采用多组分加权分析法判断不同提取、配伍方法(即先配伍后提取的方法和先分别提取后合并的方法)的优劣。采用紫外分光光度法测定不同提取、配伍方法中黄柏的总生物碱的含量;采用HPLC法测定不同配伍方法中主要化学成分的含量。结果:黄柏和苍术采用先分提再合并的配伍方法较好,各评价指标均较高。结论:黄柏、苍术配伍建议采用先分别提取再合并的方法进行配伍。该方法可作为黄柏、苍术药对配伍研究的基础。Objective:To research the different proportions of Phellodendri Chinensis Cortex and Atraetylodis Rhizoma. Methods : Multicomponent weighting analysis method was applied to estimate the effect of the different extraction and proportion methods (first combined and then extracted and first separately extracted and then combined ). The contents of total alkaloids were determined with UV speetrophotometry and contents of main components were determined with RP-HPLC.Besults : All of the evaluating indicators of first separately extracted and then combined methods were better and higher. Conclusions : The method of first separately extracted and then combined was suggested. This method could be the basic work in researching the proportions of Phellodendri Chinensis Cortex and Atractylodis Rhizoma.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.19.74.8