场外交易市场民事纠纷解决机制研究  

A Research on the Settlement Mechanism of Civil Disputes in the Over-the-Counter Market

作　　者：万国华[1] 杨海静[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学法学院,天津300071

出　　处：《政法学刊》2014年第2期5-13,共9页Journal of Political Science and Law

基　　金：2013年度天津哲学社会科学规划项目"非上市公司治理视角下我国场外交易市场监管法律制度研究"(TJFX13-005)

摘　　要：场外交易市场的特殊主体、特殊交易制度、特殊融资产品和特殊监管制度导致场外交易市场纠纷呈现出了与交易所市场不同的类型和特点。现有证券市场纠纷解决诉讼机制天然不足,非诉机制严重缺失。完善场外交易市场纠纷解决应从诉与非诉两种路径展开,扩大证券民事诉讼受案范围,废除起诉条件的前置程序,完善代表人诉讼制度,实行因果关系推定和举证责任倒置,同时建立相互衔接的内、外部纠纷调解机制和完善的证券仲裁裁决机制。Owing to the particularity of subject, transaction system, financing products and supervision system, disputes in the over - the - counter market have presented great differences in terms of types and characteristics from the exchange markets. Current litigation resolution mechanism on securities disputes is poor because of its inherent defects and the alternative resolution mechanism is deficient now. The dispute settlement mechanism in the over - the - counter market should be improved from litigation ways and non - litigation ways, such as enlarging the case scope of civil procedures, abolishing the prepositional procedures of the indicating conditions, perfecting the representative action system, carrying out the causation presumption, shifting the burden of evidence and establishing the internal and external mediation mechanism and arbitration mechanism.

关 键 词：场外交易市场 民事诉讼 仲裁 

分 类 号：D912.287[政治法律—民商法学]