检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴素文[1] 张伟玲[2] 黄传芝[1] 曾庆记 陈智国[1] 邓能尚 潘雪玲[4]
机构地区:[1]广东省广宁县人民医院脑科中心,广东广宁526300 [2]广东省广宁县人民医院综合ICU,广东广宁526300 [3]广东省广宁县人民医院神经内科,广东广宁526300 [4]广东省广宁县人民医院高压氧治疗中心,广东广宁526300
出 处:《中国当代医药》2014年第19期104-106,共3页China Modern Medicine
基 金:广东省肇庆市科技创新计划项目(2013E2817)
摘 要:目的探讨应用高压氧治疗脑外伤失语症的护理方法,并观察其临床效果。方法选取2012年6月~2014年4月本院120例脑外伤失语症患者,在尊重患者或其家属治疗意见的基础上将其分为观察组与对照组,每组60例,对照组实施常规护理,观察组实施高压氧护理干预方法,比较两组护理干预前后中国康复研究中心汉语标准失语症检查(CRRCAE)评分及干预后各种失语症状的发生率。结果干预后两组CRRCAE评分均高于干预前(P〈0.05),观察组CRRCAE评分高于对照组(P〈0.05),观察组完全性失语、运动性失语、感觉性失语及命名性失语的发生率均显著低于对照组(P〈0.05)。结论高压氧护理干预能有效提高高压氧治疗失语症的临床效果,改善患者的失语症状,值得临床重视。Objective To investigate the nursing method of hyperbaric oxygen for aphasia of traumatic brain injury. Methods 120 cases of patients with traumatic brain injury aphasia were divided into observation group and control group,60 cases in each group,the control group were implemented of routine care,the observation group were used hyperbaric oxygen nursing intervention,then China rehabilitation research center aphasia examination (CRRCAE) score and intervention overall average various aphasia symptoms were compared before and after nursing intervention. Resuits After intervention,CRRCAE score in the two groups were higher than those before intervention (P〈0.05),the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P〈0.05);the existence of complete aphasia,motor aphasia,sensory aphasia and anomic aphasia in observation group were significantly lower than those of control group (P〈0.05). Conclusion Effective nursing intervention can effectively improve the clinical effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy aphasia symptoms,it is worthy of attention.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.32