试析武则天时期的劝农与科责  

An Analysis on the Quannong and Penalty of Wuzetian Period

作　　者：吴树国[1] 李明瑶[2] 

机构地区：[1]黑龙江大学黑龙江流域文明研究中心,哈尔滨150080 [2]吉林广播电视大学,长春130022

出　　处：《哈尔滨工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第4期97-101,141,共5页Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"中晚唐至北宋前期赋役立法研究"(10CZS012);黑龙江大学杰出青年基金项目"唐代色役制度研究"(JC2011W5)

摘　　要：武则天时期的劝农性科责无论对象还是惩罚的力度都与中国古代历史上通常的劝农形式有别。究其根源,一方面是由于武则天将劝农与官吏考课联系起来,并辅之以严厉的监察,促使地方官员进一步向基层吏员和百姓施压,从而导致严厉的科罚。另一方面,武则天时期出现大量浮户,劝农与科责既是在民户逃亡后保证农业生产继续的手段,也是巩固劝农政绩、招徕户口归农的措施。武则天时期的劝农性科责从某种程度上保证了这一阶段农业经济的发展,但政府的"劝农"本质最终还是促使劝农官与基层农业生产管理日益疏离,劝农愈趋形式化。The Quannong and penalty of Wuzetian period is obviously different from ordinary Quannong in Chinese history by obj ect or punishment dynamics.There are two reasons.On the one hand,Wuzetian had associated Qannong with official assessment and severe supervision resulted in lo-cal officials penalty to grassroots managers and the people.On the other hand,the Quannong and pen-alty was also an action of ensuring agricultural production,consolidating the Quannong achievement and accepting to farmers.The Quannong and penalty of Wuzetian period had ensured the development of agricultural economy in a way,but the essence of the government＇s Quannong would take the for-malization with the alienation between Quannong officials and management of agriculture production.

关 键 词：劝农 科责 武则天 

分 类 号：K24[历史地理—历史学]