“异体复制”的定性与复制权规定的完善——以我国《著作权法》第三次修改为契机  

The Nature of Foreign Copy and the Improvement of Copy Right Provisions

作　　者：焦和平[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心,湖北武汉430037

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2014年第4期119-126,共8页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：中南财经政法大学博士后研究项目"促进知识产权服务业发展制度研究";西北政法大学"文化产业发展与知识产权问题研究"青年学术创新团队项目

摘　　要：在现行《著作权法》中,异体复制是否属于"复制"规定不明,理论与实务也均存在分歧。基于解释论的立场,通过对《著作权》第10条第5项依循文义、体系和目的三种解释进路,可以得出异体复制属于"复制"的结论。基于立法论的立场,有必要将复制权的定义修改为"以任何方式或者采用任何形式将作品固定在有形载体上的权利",以使其涵盖异体复制行为,并达到国际公约的要求,促进我国文化产业的发展。In the current copyright law, whether foreign copy belongs to copy is unknown, which is controversial in theory and practice. Based on interpretivism, and through the three interpretation approaches of text, system and purpose concerning Article 10 of Copyright Law, it may be concluded that foreign copy belongs to copy. Based on legislative theory, it is necessary to amend the copy right definition to that in any form or by any form will work on the tangible cartier of rights, so that it may cover the replication behavior, and reach the requirements of international conventions, and promote the development of cultural industry in our country.

关 键 词：异体复制 复制权 《著作权法》修改 

分 类 号：DF523.1[政治法律—民商法学]