宪法解释方法的两种传统及其启示  

Two Traditions of Constitutional Interpretation Methods and Their Enlightenment

作　　者：孙光宁[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学威海法学院,山东大学(威海)法律方法论研究基地

出　　处：《北方法学》2014年第4期137-145,共9页Northern Legal Science

基　　金：笔者主持的2011年国家社会科学基金青年项目“社会矛盾化解的法律适用方法研究”(项目编号11CFX002)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：宪法解释的重要性已经得到了普遍的认可,而在宪法解释方法的历史发展中,存在着两大分支:德国传统和美国传统,二者分别以文义解释和原旨主义为主导性解释方法。虽然两种传统有着诸多差异,但从20世纪以来却出现了趋同的倾向,以重视社会学解释方法为集中表现。在两种传统的差异与趋同中,中国宪法解释可以受到多方面的启示,包括回归宪法文本、期待个案发轫、扩展主体范围和重视社会效果等。The importance of constitutional interpretation has been well recognized .There are two tradi-tions of constitutional interpretation in history , namely German tradition and American tradition with literal in-terpretation and originalism as their respective main methods of interpretation .Despite the differences , the two traditions are becoming more and more in common since last century and both concentrate on the sociological interpretation method .The constitutional interpretation in China can be enlightened in many perspectives from their divergence and convergence , such as returning to constitutional text , expecting specific case initiation , expanding scope of subjects and valuing social effects .

关 键 词：宪法解释 文义解释方法 原旨主义 社会学解释方法 

分 类 号：DF2[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]