检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁忠翠[1]
出 处:《福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2014年第4期146-153,共8页Journal of Fujian Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基 金:国家社科基金项目<蒙藏委员会委员长更迭与国民政府治藏政策演变轨迹之研究>(课题号:13BMZ032)阶段性成果
摘 要:"二战"后英国实力下降,被迫从中国西藏收缩、撤退。英国人和印度人在移交涉藏利益方面出现龃龉。1947年,中国西藏地方当局完成了政权重组,独立派喧嚣一时;亲英的中国西藏地方当局对口惠而实不至的印度人,颇存疑虑;国民政府内战败象显露和美国人急欲插手西藏,又勾起了中国西藏地方当局独立派"身份证明"的遐想。围绕中国西藏权益,1947年前后英国人、印度人、美国人、中国西藏地方当局独立派都面临着适应新角色、制定新政策的问题。The Britain's strength declined after Word War I[ and it had to draw back its power in Chinese Tibet which mainly reflected in that it turned over its relevant Tibet interests to the new India regime before and after India independence in 1947. Of course, the seasoned Britain and newborn India had bumped heads in the process. 1947 was a year of special significance for Chinese Tibet: the Tibet local authority had been reconstructed and the independents bustled for a time but was confused about India's lip service; the National Government's sign of defeat and the United State's forwardness to hand in Tibet affairs evoked Tibetan independents' daydream of identification. Around this year, the British, the Indian, the American and the Tibetan independents were all faced with the issue of adapting to new role and formulating new policy around China Tibet interests.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15