中印国民收入初次分配格局比较  

The Contrast of Initial Distribution Pattern of National Income between India and China

作　　者：任太增[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南师范大学商学院,河南新乡453007

出　　处：《河南师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2014年第4期1-8,共8页Journal of Henan Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(10BJY030)

摘　　要：对发展中国家而言,只有对混合收入进行拆分,才能较为准确地反映国民收入分配的实际,才能进行有效的国家间的比较。与印度相比,中国住户部门份额明显偏低,企业部门份额和政府部门份额明显偏高。中印两国国民收入初次分配格局演变的趋势表明,国民收入分配格局演变的一般趋势同样适用于发展中大国,只不过随着时间的推移,无论是下降还是上升的拐点都不能机械地套用发达国家的数字。在我国,提高住户部门份额必须与转变经济发展方式、调整产业结构结合起来;降低政府份额,必须转变政府职能,厘清政府、市场、社会的关系。For developing countries, only mixed income split, to more accurately reflect the actual distribution of national income, in order to carry out an effective comparison between countries. Compared with India, the household share of China was significantly lower; however the corporate and government departments share was significantly higher. The Trends of China and India＇s Primary Distributing Structure of National Income shows that the evolution of the national income distribution pattern also applies to the general trend of large developing countries, but over time, whether the inflection point is down or rising can not be applied the number of developed countries mechanically. In China, the share of the household sector must improve and the transformation of economic development mode, adjust the industrial structure to combine; reduce government share, we must transform government functions, to clarify the relationship between the government, the market and society.

关 键 词：国民收入 分配格局 混合收入 中国 印度 

分 类 号：F113.8[经济管理—国际贸易]