因特网与其管辖权——国际原则已经出现但对抗也隐约可见  

作　　者：罗伯特.L.霍格 克里斯托夫.P.博姆 何乃刚[3] 黄列[4] 

机构地区：[1]乔治敦大学 [2]Carter Ledyard & Milburn(华盛顿特区)律师事务所 [3]上海社会科学院信息研究所 [4]中国社会科学院法学研究所

出　　处：《环球法律评论》2001年第1期43-51,共9页Global Law Review

摘　　要：Taking the judicial practice and legislative attempts of two internet-developed regions,the U.S. and Europe,as the background,the authors of the article analysis the application of traditional concepts such as “minimum contacts”,“fair competition and substantive justice” and “purposeful availment” in IT disputes.Besides,the authors also discuss the advantage and disadvantage of jurisdiction approaches based on some new principles of “country of origin” and “home jurisdiction”.Taking the judicial practice and legislative attempts of two internet-developed regions,the U.S. and Europe,as the background,the authors of the article analysis the application of traditional concepts such as “minimum contacts”,“fair competition and substantive justice” and “purposeful availment” in IT disputes.Besides,the authors also discuss the advantage and disadvantage of jurisdiction approaches based on some new principles of “country of origin” and “home jurisdiction”.

关 键 词：法院 因特网 管辖权 美国 '滑动范围' 欧盟 损害事件发生地 国籍原则 

分 类 号：D996.1[政治法律—经济法学]