检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:傅克治[1] 傅密宁 王荣阁[1] 李春涛[1] 武文霖[1]
机构地区:[1]黑龙江省中医研究院中药研究所
出 处:《黑龙江中医药》1991年第2期42-45,共4页Heilongjiang Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:柴胡来源真伪,质量优劣直接关系临床疗效.本文就黑龙江省所见4种柴胡药材做了质量比较的鉴定.根据传统经验论述和现代研究结果,认为我省西部松嫩草原所产狭叶柴胡符合传统质量及中国药典标准要求,可供作中药“柴胡”应用于临床,其他3种柴胡产地、分布迥异,大叶柴胡和锥叶柴胡药材的形、色、质、气、味与狭叶柴胡比较,有显著差异,且前者尚有毒性,两者绝不可当作中药“柴胡”应用;至于柞柴胡药材性状虽与狭叶柴胡近似,但尚缺乏详细的系统研究,不可轻易等同使用.This paper makes a differentiation on four Bupleurum categories which are commonlyfound on herbal market in Heilongjiang.According to traditional assessments and the cur-rent experimental results,it is concluded that Radix Bupleuri Scorzonerifolii native toSongren steppe in Heilongjiang fulfills the criteria and norms of traditional assessments andthe Chinese Pharmacopoeia and it can be recommended as the Chinese herb“Chaihu” usedin clinic for practitioners while the other three Bupleurum allied species being distributed toquite different geological regions are not suitable to recommend as “Chaihu” prescribed inclinical formulas.Additionally,Rhizoma Bupleuri Longeradiati and Radix BupleuriBicaule differ greatly from Radix Bupleuri Scorzonerifolii in shape,color,texture,odorand taste,and the former shows poisonous.As for Radix Bupleuri Komaroviani,al-though its characters are similar to Radix Bupleuri Scorzonerifolii,yet it can not be re-placed each other due to the imperfect and unreliable less research data of it.
分 类 号:R282.710.3[医药卫生—中药学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117