应用不同湍流模型计算叶栅流场的结果与比较  

Numerical Simulation of Cascades with Different Turbulence Models

作　　者：朱永波[1] 赵晓路[2] 蔡睿贤[2] 

机构地区：[1]中国科学院声学研究所,北京100080 [2]中国科学院工程热物理研究所,北京100080

出　　处：《航空动力学报》2001年第1期71-74,共4页Journal of Aerospace Power

摘　　要：采用有限体积 TVD-LW格式求解 N-S方程 ,使用了 B-L模型、高雷诺数 k-ε模型和低雷诺数 k-ε模型等多种湍流模型。并且用具体算例说明本文所用程序的可靠性 ,比较了 3种的湍流模型的特点。B-L模型最大的优点是简单、使用方便。 k-ε方程适应性强 ,分为低雷诺数 k-ε方程和高雷诺数 k-ε方程两种。高雷诺数 k-ε方程比低雷诺数 k-ε方程精度略低 ,但所需计算时间和存储量都比后者小 ,网格也可以粗些。 k-ε模型对粘性层、分离区有比较高的分辨能力 ,高雷诺数 k-ε模型比较适于一般数值计算。The finite-volume TVD-LW N-S solvers were developed by using B-L model of high Re number k-ε model and low Re number k-ε model respectively.Some numerical examples have been calculated to demonstrate the resolving capability of the numerical method for boundary layer,separative region and shock.The advantage of B-L model is simplicity and convenience.The k-ε model has high adaptability,and can be divided to two types.One is low Re number k-ε model, for which the wall function is not used;and the other is high Re number k-ε model,for which the wall function is used.The precision of the low Re number k-ε model is better than that of high Re number k-ε model,but it requires more computer time,storage capacity,and larger grid.The k-ε model can predict boundary separation.For convectional calculation,high Re number k-ε model is more suitable as it can provide required precision with coarser grid.

关 键 词：N-S方程 湍流流模型 叶栅流动 计算 叶栅流场 

分 类 号：O357.5[理学—流体力学]