检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐海波[1] 孔祥泉[1] 杨亚莉[1] 肖学宏[1] 熊茵[1] 刘定西[1] 杨帆[1] 许林峰[1] 于群[1] 彭振军[1] 戴文[1]
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院MR室,武汉430022
出 处:《临床放射学杂志》2001年第5期392-397,共6页Journal of Clinical Radiology
摘 要:目的 通过多种磁共振血管造影 (MRA)技术对模拟狭窄血管的体外模型和四肢血管性疾病应用研究分析 ,评估其临床应用价值和限度。材料与方法 ( 1)实验研究 :对不同狭窄程度、长度的模型行二维时间飞跃法磁共振血管造影 ( 2DTOFMRA)、幅度对比血管造影 (MCA)、增强幅度对比血管造影 (CEMCA)和三维动态增强磁共振血管造影 ( 3DCEMRA)检查 ,测量并计算狭窄程度、长度和分级准确度。 ( 2 )临床应用 :对 2 0例怀疑有四肢血管相关性疾病的患者行 3DCEMRA、2DTOFMRA和幅度对比MRA (MCMRA)。比较其图像质量和血管显示情况。结果 ( 1)实验研究 :2DTOFMRA、MCA、CEMCA和 3DCEMRA对明显狭窄 ( 69% )的分级准确度分别为 3 6.4%、9.1%、18.2 %和 72 .7% ,3DCEMRA对明显狭窄 (≥ 5 0 % )的评估优于其他MRA方法 (P <0 .0 0 1) ,但比起真实值仍有明显高估 (P <0 .0 0 1)。( 2 )临床应用 :2DTOFMRA、MCA和 3DCEMRA的动脉显示率分别为 92 .6%、94.4%和 98.1% ,以及对 12例血管瘤的异常血管显示分别为 0例、6例和 11例。 3DCEMRA均能较好地显示血管狭窄程度、供血血管起源、病变部位及病灶与血管的关系。结论 3DCEMRA无论是图像质量、狭窄程度的评估还是病灶的供血血管及病灶与血管关系的显示具有明显优势 。Objective To evaluate different magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) sequences in detecting peripheral vascular disease by means of a study in vitro with an arterial stenotic model.Materials and Methods (1) study in vitro : 2D TOF, magnitude contrast (MC, with or without Gd DTPA) and 3D contrast enhanced MRA were performed in nonpulsatile stenotic experimental model. The degree, length of the stenosis and the accuracy of stenotic grading were measured, The results of MRA in detecting the degree and length of stenosis were compared with the findings on conventional angiography (CA) and the actual values. (2) Clinical application: 3D CE MRA, 2D TOF MRA and MC MRA were performed in 20 patients with suspected vascular disease in extremities. A comparison of image quality and the displaying of vessels was made between different MRA sequences. Results (1) Study in vitro: The grading accuracy of 2D TOF MRA, MCA, CE MCA and 3D CE MRA for significant stenosis (69%) was 36.4%, 9.1%, 18.2% and 72.7%, respectively. 3D CE MRA was superior to other MRA sequences in assessing the degree of significant stenosis (≥50%), P<0.001, though the value was still overestimated compared to the actual value (P<0.001). (2) Clinical application: The displaying rate of the artery with 2D TOF MRA, MCA and 3D CE MRA was 92.6%, 94.4% and 98.1%, respectively. Of 12 hemangiomas, 2D TOF MRA, MCA and 3D CE MRA demonstrated 0, 6 and 11, respectively. 3D CE MRA could well display the vascular stenosis, the source of the lesion feeding artery and the relationship of the lesion with the blood supply. Conclusion 3D CE MRA is obviously superior to other MRA techniques in obtaining high imaging quality, actually assessing the severity of the stenosis and observing the anatomy of the diseased vessels, although overestimation of the stenotic degree is difficult to avoid.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229