检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]解放军第292医院外二科
出 处:《临床骨科杂志》1998年第1期10-12,共3页Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics
摘 要:目的验证刻槽针治疗股骨颈骨折较普通斯氏针更具有锚固性。方法通过生物力学试验,采用均质木块与牛股骨按骨折固定方式钉入4mm斯氏针与刻槽针,置弹簧拉力试验机上进行拔出力对比。并将刻槽针临床应用于50例股骨颈骨折的治疗。结果斯氏针在木块上平均拔出力为10.2kg,刻槽针为21.00kg,为斯氏针的2倍;斯氏针在牛股骨上的平均拔出力为5.7kg,刻槽针为14.5kg,为斯氏针的2.45倍。刻槽针临床应用效果良好。结论刻槽针治疗股骨颈骨折较斯氏针固定牢固,临床应用证实无脱针。Objective To testify whether treating femoral neck fracture with troughed pins is more secure than that with Steinmann pins. Methods 4 mm Steinmann pin and troughed pin were wedged into wood lumps and ox bones for traction and the traction power of both pins was compared. The troughed pins were applied to treat 50 patients with femoral neck fracture. Results Steinmann pin was pulled out from wood by strength of 10 2 kg. As for troughed pin, it was 21 0 kg, 2 06 times as heavy as Steinmann pin. Steinmann pin was pulled out from ox bone by strength of 5 7 kg. As for troughed pin, it was 14 5 kg, 2 54 times as heavy as Steinmann pin. Conclusion Troughed pins are firmer and have stronger fixity than Steinmann pins in treating femoral neck fracture, and no pins are slipped or broken.
关 键 词:股骨颈骨折 生物力学 骨折固定术 内 斯氏针 刻槽针
分 类 号:R683.420.5[医药卫生—骨科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117