检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张英[1]
出 处:《武汉科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2001年第2期46-49,89,共5页Journal of Wuhan University of Science and Technology:Social Science Edition
摘 要:欧洲法院的管辖权作为欧共体司法制度的核心,一直是西方学者研究欧共体法律的热点问题。本文在对初步裁决程序与直接诉讼程序之间的区别与联系进行比较分析的基础上,着重讨论了二者之间所存在的管辖权重叠问题及欧洲法院关于这两种司法程序间的冲突之解决办法。试图由以说明,欧洲法院初步裁决权的实现与欧共体的法制建设密不可分。The issue of the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice(ECJ) is of great importance in the Commu-nity judicial system, which has attracted great attention of the scholars in the field of the Community Law. The au-thor has made a comprehensive study into the procedure of preliminary ruling of ECJ under Article 234{177} EEC with a contract with the jurisdiction of direct actions under Article 226{169} and Article 230{ 173} EEC. There exist an overlap and the conflicts among the above jurisdictions, and it is the Court thai has solved this issue through its judicial practice. The author seeks to make it known that the establishment and the development of the Community' s judicial system is almost impossible without the performance of the jurisdiction of the ECJ under Article 234{177} EEC.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.90.172