检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李植荣[1]
出 处:《临床精神医学杂志》2001年第3期141-142,共2页Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
摘 要:目的 :探索司法精神医学鉴定中现实动机作案者与责任能力之间的关系。 方法 :分析78例现实动机作案者的责任能力。 结果 :除 2 4例无精神病外 ,其余 5 4例有各种精神障碍的作案者中有 31例评定为限制责任能力 ,2 3例评定为完全责任能力 ,无 1例能完全免除责任能力。 结论 :动机论适合于司法精神医学鉴定实践 ,现实动机作案者 ,不论其精神状态如何 ,均不能完全免除刑事责任。Objective:To explore the relations between committing a crime with reality motive and responsibility in psychiatric expert testimony,and evaluate the motive theory. Method:Seventy-eight criminals with reality motive were analyzed with their responsibility. Results:Except for 22 criminals without illness,among the rest 56 criminals with mental disorders,31 were limited responsibi-lity,25 complete responsibility.No one can entirely excuse responsibility. Conclusion:The motive theory is fit for the practice in psychiatric expert testimony.No matter what psychiatric states they are,the criminals with reality motive couldn't completely excuse criminal responsibility.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3