对提高招标工程评标委员会打分信度与效度的思考——兼谈现行《招标投标法》中的某些不完善之处  

Thinking on the Improvement of the Examination Committee's Marking Reliability and Validity in Project Bidding ——Also on Certain Defects of Present “Bidding and Tendering Law

作　　者：王洪生[1] 王玉强[1] 

机构地区：[1]曲阜师范大学,山东曲阜273165

出　　处：《山东建材》2001年第3期47-49,共3页Shandong Building Materials

摘　　要：分别就评分指标设置与指标权重、评委成员组成、评委个人责任、畸高畸低打分的消除、评标专家劳务补偿等五个方面探讨了在我国有及公有投资工程招标评标过程中提高专家打分信度与效度的措施 ,同时指出了我国现行《招标投标法》中的某些尚不完善之处。With the author's own experiences as basis,this thesis makes a tentative probe into the measures of improving specialists' reliability and validity in state-owned and collective-owned project bidding from the following five aspects :index setting and flexible strategy ,the examination committee members ,individual responsibility ,the abolishment of extreme marking ,service charge of specialists Meanwhile,it points out certain defects of present “Bidding and Tendering Law

关 键 词：工程招标 评分指标设置 指标权重计算 

分 类 号：F284[经济管理—国民经济]