检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王莉[1] 杨宇如[1] 卢一平[1] 沈宏[1] 唐科仕[1] 欧爱陵[1] 代波[1] 代波
机构地区:[1]华西医科大学附属第一医院泌尿外科,成都610041
出 处:《中华器官移植杂志》2001年第4期207-208,共2页Chinese Journal of Organ Transplantation
摘 要:目的 研究环孢素A (CsA)血药浓度变异系数 (CV)的临床意义。方法 185例尸肾移植受者 ,其中口服CsA微乳剂 (CsA ME)组 92例 (排斥反应 15例 ) ,口服CsA普通胶囊 (CsA GC)组93例 (排斥反应 2 1例 )。比较CsA ME组与CsA GC组CsA血药浓度变异系数的差异及排斥组与非排斥组CsA血药浓度变异系数的差异。结果 CsA ME组血药浓度变异系数小于CsA GC组 (P <0 .0 5 )。排斥反应组CsA血药浓度变异系数高于非排斥组的变异系数 (P <0 .0 5 )。结论 口服CsA ME血药浓度更稳定。排斥反应的发生与CsA血药浓度不稳定有关。CsA血药浓度变异系数是反映个体对CsA生物利用度变化大小的较可靠的指标 ,可以指导临床血药浓度的监测频度。Objective To evaluate the clinical implication of coefficient of variation (CV) of cyclosporine (CsA) blood concentration.Methods Of the 185 recipients of cadaveric renal transplantation, 92 were treated with the microemulsion of CsA (CsA-ME) (15 cases occurring rejection), 93 with the emulsion get caps (CsA-GC) (21 occurring rejection). The CV of CsA blood concentration in the CsA-ME group was compared with that in the CsA-GC group and the CV of CsA in the rejection group with that in the non-rejection group.Results The CV of CsA blood concentration was lower in the CsA-ME group than in the CsA-GC group (P< 0.05), and the CV of CsA blood concentration was higher in the rejection group than in the non-rejection group (P<0.05).Conclusions The blood concentration of CsA-ME is more steady than that of CsA-GC. The episode of rejection is associated with the unsteady concentration of CsA. CV is a valuable index reflecting the individual variability in cyclosporine pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients and can be used to determine the frequency of blood monitoring.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249