从“反传统”到“再造文明”——“五四”现代性方案再认识  

From "Anti-Tradition" to "Reconstruction of Civilizat ion": The May 4th Movement's Modernity Programme Revisited

作　　者：洪峻峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学学报编辑部,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《厦门大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2001年第3期47-54,共8页Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学规划基金资助项目 (98BDJ0 0 8)

摘　　要：在当前关于现代性的讨论中 ,“五四”现代性方案受到多种责难。人们指责“五四”把传统与现代性对立起来 ,对传统资源完全漠视和否弃。其实 ,在“五四”前期 ,新文化人之所以把传统与现代对立起来 ,正是基于作为现代性前提的“进步”观念。到“五四”后期 ,新文化人已对现代性方案作出修改。他们改变全面反传统的思路 ,主张在综合中西文化的基础上“再造文明” ,其中包含着对中国传统资源的珍视和肯定 ;同时实际致力于传统资源的开发和利用 。In current discussions of modernity, variou s criticisms are directed a t the modernity programme of the May 4th Movement (M4M). Some criticize M4M for bringing forth a dichotomy between tradition and modernity and completely neglec ting the resources of Chinese traditions. This paper argues that, in the early p eriod of M4M, the New Cultural Pioneers regarded tradition as conflicting with m odernity because they believed that the 'progressive' ideas were a prerequisite of modernity. In the later period, however, they revised their programme and pro posed that 'reconstruction of civilization' should be based on a combination of western and Chinese cultures as well as a positive attitude towards the resource s of Chinese traditions. Besides, they made every effort to develop and utilize traditional resources thereby providing traditional support for the construction of modernity.

关 键 词："五四"运动 现代性 反传统 "再造文明" 传统资源 开发利用 进步观念 

分 类 号：K261.1[历史地理—历史学] K203[历史地理—中国史]