检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]桂林工学院勘察设计院,广西桂林541004 [2]南昌大学土木工程学院,江西南昌330000
出 处:《桂林工学院学报》2001年第3期224-229,共6页Journal of Guilin University of Technology
摘 要:通过对一代表性强夯处理填土地基实例强夯前后地基加固效果的对比分析 ,发现低能量区填土层的加固效果稍优于高能量区填土层的加固效果 ,一定的深度内 ,在相同的夯击能作用下 ,厚度较小的填土层的加固效果稍优于厚度较大的填土层加固效果。对于这一与通常人们认知有所不同的现象 ,运用波的反射透射理论进行了解释 :填土层下伏硬层的存在及埋深的大小 ,是引起强夯加固效果差异的主要因素。通过对强夯地基各种测试方法确定的承载力与载荷试验结果进行对比分析 ,认为用于确定一般自然沉积土的承载力的常规方法不适用于强夯地基土 ,根据标贯试验击数与载荷试验结果之间存在的相关关系 ,提出了根据标贯试验击数确定强夯地基土承载力的经验公式 :fk=0 4N2 +6 0N。By comparison of the improving effect of heavy tamping in a representative fill foundation before and after heavy tamping, it is found that the improving effect of the fill tamped with lower energy is slightly better than that with higher energy, and the improving effect of the thinner fill is slightly better than that of the thicker fill in the same tamping energy area. This phenomenon is explained by wave propagation theory. It is thought that the harder layers beneath the fill are the main factors causing the differences of improving effect on this site. Through the comparison between the bearing capacity of tamped soil determined by different testing methods and that determined by load-bearing test, it is concluded that the general methods to determine the bearing capacity of the natural soil is not fit for determining that of the tamped soil.An empirical formula is proposed as: f k=0.4N 2+6.0N?
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229