检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]大庆油田有限责任公司试油试采公司
出 处:《油气井测试》2001年第3期57-60,共4页Well Testing
摘 要:地层测试管柱中的漏失判别已成为不容忽视的问题。以往初终静液柱压力差法 (A -E法 )及二开井初与初开井末压力差法 (B2 -C1法 )都各有利弊 ,均不能准确判别漏失与否。在对以往测试资料的综合分析研究基础上 ,提出了B1法。将此三种方法结合应用 ,制定出适合目前测试需要的漏失判别标准。Judging leakage in well testing string has become a noticeable problem.The former methods which are the difference pressure between initial and final static liquid head (A-E method ) and the difference pressure between initial period of the second time open well and final period of the first time open well (B 2-C 1 method) have some advantages and disadvan tages respectively,that can not define whether the leak-off is exist or not.Based on comprehensive study and analysis to former testing data,the paper suggests the B 1 method.By synthetically utilizing this three kinds of methods,a criterion of leakage judgment which is suit for the need of well testing at present has been set up.
分 类 号:TE151[石油与天然气工程—油气勘探] TE273
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117