检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京航空学院
出 处:《空气动力学学报》1991年第2期270-274,共5页Acta Aerodynamica Sinica
摘 要:对流场中含激波问题,若用有限元法来数值模拟,目前较有效的方法是SUPG方法和PG方法。本文讨论了这两种方法在数值求解N-S方程组时具有等效性,并对它们的应用前景作了简单的评估。For the numerical simulation of flow fields and problems containing shocks, the stremline upwind/Petrov-Galerkin method (SUPG) and penalty-Galerkin method (PG) are the most effective finite element methods of all. In this paper, further elaboration on the general aspects of the above two methods is given here. And we prove that they are equivalent in solving unsteady N-S equations numerically. But as to PG, It is only applied to solving unsteady N-S. equations for transonic flows, and requires none of source terms. Therefore, at least presently, there is a great limitation for PG in applications. And it is difficult to extend further. SUPG has no these drawbacks. And in SUPG, the capturing technique of strong discontinuities can be developed. For these reasons, SUPG has good prospects for applications.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222