检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘力[1] 庄志雄[2] 陈雯[1] 杨杏芬[1] 张桥[1] 杜柳涛[1] 魏青[1] 邓丽霞[1]
机构地区:[1]中山医科大学公共卫生学院卫生毒理学教研室,广东广州510080 [2]中国预防医学科学院深圳研究中心,广东深圳518020
出 处:《中国药理学与毒理学杂志》2001年第4期282-286,共5页Chinese Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology
摘 要:本研究旨在探讨线粒体DNA氧化损伤热点的形成是否与该点DNA修复速率慢有关 .BRL 3A细胞暴露于 5 0mmol·L- 1过氧化氢 (H2 O2 ) 30min后 ,分别于 0 ,1,4及 2 4h收获细胞 ,应用连接介导聚合酶链反应分析线粒体DNA氧化损伤热点的修复百分率并与线粒体DNA氧化损伤的总修复百分率比较 ,通过狭缝印迹法 ,比较了各时间点细胞内p5 3/线粒体DNA比率来验证其修复的可靠性 .结果表明 :在 4及2 4h ,热点的修复速率分别为 5 .2 %和 4 2 .1% .而线粒体DNA的总修复百分率分别为 76 .9%和 84 .1% ,后者与前者相比 ,其修复速率快 1~ 14倍左右 .应用狭缝印迹发现各时间点细胞内p5 3/线粒体DNA比率无明显变化 .因此 ,线粒体DNA氧化损伤热点的形成与其修复速率较慢有关 .In order to study whether or not the formation of mtDNA oxidative damage hotspots is related to its slow DNA repair, BRL 3A cells were exposed to 50 mmol·L -1 H 2O 2 for 30 min and then harvested at 0, 1, 4 and 24 h, respectively. The repair percentage of hotspots was analyzed by the method of LMPCR and then compared with that of overall mtDNA oxidative damage. Blot slot assay was also utilized to show the authenticity of mtDNA repair. Our results showed that at 4 and 24 h, the repair percentage of hotspots were 5.2% and 42.1%, but that of overall mtDNA oxidative repair were 76.9% and 84.1%, the repair rate of overall mtDNA oxidative damage was 1-14 folds faster than that of hospots. The results of slot blot assay showed that p53/mtDNA ratio in cellular total DNA at each time point was not significantly different. These results suggest that the formation of mtDNA oxidative damage hotspots is related to its slow repair rate, and the results of slot blot assay indicate that our repair rate can authentically describe the real conditions.
关 键 词:线粒体 DNA修复 氧化损伤热点 连接介导聚合酶链反应 修复速率
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38