检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林建荣[1] 黄煜坤[1] 陈国中[1] 林振强[1] 朱国
出 处:《中国新药与临床杂志》2001年第5期351-354,共4页Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Remedies
摘 要:目的 :比较西酞普兰和阿米替林治疗抑郁症的疗效和不良反应 ,方法 :抑郁症病人 88例 ,采用西酞普兰 2 2mg±s 6mg( 2 0~ 4 0mg·d 1) ,po ,疗程为 6wk。另用阿米替林治疗同类病人 87例 ,剂量为 10 0mg± 10mg( 50~ 150mg·d 1) po ,疗程为6wk。在治疗前及治疗后 1,2 ,4 ,6wk末予MAMD ,CGI ,TESS量表评定临床疗效。结果 :西酞普兰显效率 79% ,阿米替林组显效率 75% (P >0 .0 5) ,西酞普兰组不良反应较阿米替林组少。结论 :西酞普兰与阿米替林治疗抑郁症疗效相当 ,前者较后者起效快 ,不良反应少。AIM:To compare the efficacy and adverse reactions of citalopram and amitriptyline in treating depression. METHODS:Eighty eight patients with depression(group A,M 36,F 52; age 32 a± s 7 a; disease duration 20 mo±6 mo) were treated with citalopram 22 mg±6 mg(20 40 mg·d 1 ), po . Another 87 patients with depression(group B, M34,F 53; age 31.2 a±2.3 a; disease duration 22 mo±4 mo) were treated with amitriptyline 100 mg±10 mg(50 150 mg·d 1 ), po , duration of treatment and within 1,2,4,6 wk after treatment to measure the therapeutic efficacy. RESULTS: In the group A and B, the excellent effective rate was 79 % and 75 %, respectively, there was no significant different between two groups( P >0.05), but group A had less adverse reactions. CONCLUSION: Citalopram shows the similar effects to amitriptyline on treatment of depression. The former effects quicker than the later and has less adverse reactions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.239