检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨柳明[1] 张瑞[1] 王华[1] 钟文英[1] 岑卓英 赵延龙[1] 黄玲[1] 孔天翰[2]
机构地区:[1]广东省廉江市人民医院中西医结合研究所,廉江524400 [2]河南医科大学生物毒素中心,郑州450052
出 处:《河南医科大学学报》2001年第6期669-670,共2页Journal of Henan Medical University
基 金:广东省中医药管理局 1999立项课题 0 9946 7
摘 要:目的 :探讨痹痛灵胶囊镇痛的临床效果。方法 :34例疼痛患者采用痹痛灵胶囊治疗 ,32例用芬必得作对照。结果 :痹痛灵组在起效时间、完全缓解时间、缓解持续时间方面均优于芬必得组 (P <0 .0 1)。痹痛灵组总有效率为 97.1% ,芬必得组总有效率为 84.4% ,痹痛灵组疗效优于芬必得组 (P <0 .0 5 ) ;不良反应发生率痹痛灵组(11.8% )明显低于对照组 (43.8% ) (P <0 .0 1)。结论 :痹痛灵胶囊镇痛疗效优于芬必得 。Aim:To explore the clinical effects of bitongling capsule on pain relief. Methods: A total of 66 patients with pain were divided into bitongling capsule treatment group(BTLG) with 34 partients and fenbid table treatment group (FBDG) with 32 patients randomly. Results:There was significant difference between these two groups in effect starting time, full remission time, remission lasting time ( P <0.01).The total efficacy rate in BTLG was 97.1% and that in FBDG was 84.4%. BTLG has better effects on pain reliet than FBDG ( P <0.05). The side effect was 11.8% in BTLG,which was lower than that in FBDG (43.8%) ( P <0.01) . Conclusion:Bitongling capsule has better effects on pain relief than fenbid table, and has no obvious side effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117