检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:左玲俊[1] 徐俊冕[1] 季建林[1] 江开达[2] 赵介城[2] 虞一萍[2]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学医学院医学心理学教研室,上海200032 [2]上海市精神卫生中心
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2001年第2期102-104,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
摘 要:目的 :比较有无糖尿病性微血管并发症的 2型糖尿病患者的认知功能。方法 :用中国临床记忆量表、中国成人智力量表以及连线测验A对 2 6例伴有糖尿病性微血管并发症的 2型糖尿病患者 (研究组 )、及 2 6例不伴有糖尿病性微血管并发症的 2型糖尿病患者 (对照组 )的认知功能进行评定 ,对照组在年龄、性别、文化程度等方面与研究组相匹配。结果 :研究组的记忆商和图像回忆分及智力测验中的图画找错分显著低于对照组 ,其他指标与对照组相比 ,差异无显著性。结论 :伴有糖尿病性微血管并发症的 2型糖尿病患者的认知功能略差于不伴有糖尿病性微血管并发症的 2型糖尿病患者。Objective: To compare the cognitive function of type 2 diabetic cases with diabetic micro-angiopathy with that of type 2 diabetic cases without diabetic micro-angiopathy. Methods: The cognitive function of 26 type 2 diabetic cases with diabetic micro-angiopathy(Study Group) and 26 type 2 diabetic cases without diabetic micro-angiopathy(Control Group) were evaluated by the Chinese Clinical Memory Scale, Chinese Adult Intelligent Scale and Trail Making A. The two groups were matched in age,sex,educational level and others. Results: The scores of memory quotient and Finding errors in Study Group were significantly lower than those in Control Group The lower score of memory quotient in the Study Group were mostly due to their lower score of Picture Free Recall.Conclusion: The cognitive function of type 2 diabetic cases with diabetic micro-angiopathywere significantly worse than that of type 2 diabetic cases without diabetic micro-angiopathy.
关 键 词:2型糖尿病 糖尿病性微血管并发症 认知功能
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28