检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]清华大学核能技术设计研究院,北京100084
出 处:《核科学与工程》2001年第3期288-292,共5页Nuclear Science and Engineering
摘 要:为了研究分段烟羽模型和烟团模型在核事故应急中的适用性 ,对不同流场条件下分段高斯烟羽模型和烟团模型的模拟结果进行了比较。在均匀稳定流场中 ,两种模型的模拟结果相近 ;而在非均匀稳定的流场中 ,分段烟羽模型的模拟结果呈现明显的不连续性。而且对于瞬时释放 ,烟团模型比分段烟羽模型更接近实际情况。通过对模型性能的对比 ,并考虑应急决策支持的要求和我国核电站的厂址条件 。Choice of atmospheric dispersion models for nuclear emergency decision making support is discussed. Comparisons are done between puff model and segmented Gaussian plume model for different flow fields. Simulation results of the two models are similar under stationary and homogeneous flow field; while under in stationary or inhomogeneous flow field, concentration distributions obtained by segmented plume model are obviously discontinuous. Moreover, more realistic results are obtained by puff model under in stationary flow field for short release. According to model characteristics, simulation results and operation time of puff model, segmented plume model and Lagrangian particle model, as well as requirements of nuclear emergency and site specific characteristics of Chinese nuclear power plants, puff model is better for nuclear emergency decision making support.
关 键 词:大气弥散 核事故应急 烟团模型 烟羽模型 决策支持系统 核电站 厂址
分 类 号:TL73[核科学技术—辐射防护及环境保护] TM623.1[电气工程—电力系统及自动化]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222