浅析新《合同法》几个概念的规范化  

On Standardizing Some Terms of the New Contract Law

作　　者：刘正[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京经济学院法律系,江苏南京210042

出　　处：《江苏理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2001年第2期39-42,共4页Journal of Jiangsu University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)

摘　　要：我国新《合同法》有关规定的称谓应规范化 ;先履行抗辩权与后履行抗辩权不可混淆 ,不宜称不安抗辩权 ;先期违约不可等同于预期违约 ;附随义务与 (先 )后合同义务、从给付义务、减损义务应加以区分 ;可追认合同还有第四种情形。Some terms of the New Contract Law should be standardized. There exists nuance between pre-perform plead rights and post-perform plead rights. It is unsuitable to put forward the name of imperfect plead rights. What is the proper name of the anticipatory breach in Chinese? Such concepts as accessory obligation, pre-contract obligation, post-contract obligation, accessory contract obligation and mitigate damage obligation should also be distinguished from each other. There is a fourth case with subsequently confirm contract.

关 键 词：《合同法》 后履行抗辩权 先期违约 附随义务 可追认合同 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]