检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]同济大学环境科学与工程学院,上海200092
出 处:《上海环境科学》2001年第12期582-585,共4页Shanghai Environmental Sciences
摘 要:运用LCA方法对普通活性污泥法、AB活性污泥法和厌氧水解-活性污泥法3种处理系统从其原材料开采和加工开始直至污水厂施工建设、处理运行以及废弃拆除的LC全过程能耗进行了识别和量化分析,并进行相互比较。研究结果表明,在微孔和穿孔管2种曝气条件下与普通活性污泥法相比,厌氧水解法的LC能耗分别节省14.0%和17.6%,并且比能耗可大幅降低40.5%~43.0%。AB法的LC能耗分别节省9.5%和15.8%,但由于产泥量较大而比能耗仅与普通活性污泥法相当。The conventional activated sludge process and two of its modifications have been evaluated using the technique of 'life-cycle analysis' to identify and quantify their energy consumption, starting from raw material extraction, through manufacture to plant construction, treatment operation and plant demolition. This enabled a comparison to be made between these process options, and the identification of opportunities for improvement of energy consumption. In this study, a comparison of the options showed that AAAS and AB process used 14.0%-17.6% and 9.5%-15.8% less LC energy than the conventional process respectively. And AAAS was found to have 40.5%-43.0% lower SEC than the conventional process, while AB process, with higher rate of sludge production, has about the same SEC as the conventional process.
关 键 词:生命周期评价 活性污泥处理 能耗分析 污水处理厂 废水处理
分 类 号:X703.1[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.225