检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:崔理华[1] 汤连茂[2] 朱夕珍[1] 张祖锡[2] 白瑛[2]
机构地区:[1]华南农业大学资源环境学院,广东广州510642 [2]中国农业大学资源与环境学院,北京100094
出 处:《农业环境保护》2002年第1期37-40,共4页Agro-Environmental Protection
基 金:成都市环保局和城建局资助项目
摘 要:在北京地区的秋、冬季和成都地区的春、夏季,用模拟人工土柱处理城市污水,研究不同季节人工土快滤床的最佳运行方式。试验结果证明,春、夏季以连续配水8h、干化16h的水力负荷率较高;秋季以连续配水8h、干化40h的水力负荷率较高;冬季以连续配水16h、干化128h的水力负荷率较高。COD、BOD5、SS和TP的去除率和处理出水浓度以连续配水8h、湿干比较大的运行方式较好;而TN则以配水8h、湿干比较小的运行方式较好。Utilization of simulating artificial soil columns for treatment of municipal wastewater was done in order to study dosing regime of artificial soil biofilter at different seasons. in autumn and winter in city of Beijing and in spring and summer in city of Chengdu, respectively. Experimental results showed that the treatments for wetting 8 hours and drying 16 hours in follow in both spring and summer; the treatments for wetting 8 hours and drying 40 hours in autumn; or the treatments for wetting 16 hours and drying 128 hours in winter, all gained higher hydraulic loading rates. In consideration of concentration of COD, BOD5, SS and TP in the treated effluent and their removal efficiency. The dosing regime of wetting 8 hours and larger ratio of wetting to drying was much better than others, whilst the treatment for wetting 8 hours and smaller ratio of wetting to drying for total nitrogen removal was more attractive than other treatments.
关 键 词:城市污水 人工土壤 生物滤床 运行方式 试验 废水处理
分 类 号:X703.1[环境科学与工程—环境工程] X799.3
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.12.163.164