检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄昭穗[1] 刘开渊[1] 陈志忠[1] 黄胜立[1] 欧阳万青[1] 黄海蓉[1]
出 处:《福建医药杂志》2002年第1期12-14,共3页Fujian Medical Journal
摘 要:目的 探讨倍欣对 2型糖尿病降糖作用的疗效。方法 将单纯饮食控制或加用磺脲类药物治疗不满意的2型糖尿病人 198例 ,随机分为倍欣组 10 0例和二甲双胍组 98例 ,疗程为 8WK。结果与结论 倍欣和二甲双胍对空服血糖均有显著性下降 ,总有效率分别为 86 .0 %、 90 .8% ,但两药降低幅度无统计学意义 P>0 .0 5 ;而倍欣对餐后 2 h血糖的疗效高于二甲双胍 ,总有效率分别为 94 .0 %、 81.6 3% (P<0 .0 1) ;两药均能明显降低 GHb AIc,但倍欣疗效高于二甲双胍 P<0 .0 5 ;两种药物不刺激胰岛素分泌 。Objective To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of Basen on 100 patients with Type Ⅱ Diabetes.Materials and methods One hundred and ninty eight cases with Type Ⅱ Diabetes,who had been treated either with controlled diet management or medicines,were randomly divided into two groups,Basen group(n=100)and metfornin(Diabex)group(n=98).The observational period was 8 weeks.Results The both Basen and Metfornin(Diabex)were significantly reduced the level of blood glucose in the fasting state(total efficacy rate was 86 0% and 90 8%,respectively).But the decreased amplitutd of blood gulcose level at 2h postmeal in Basen group was more larger than those in Metfornin group(total efficacy rate was 94 0% and 81 63%,respectively;P<0 01).Conclusion Both Basen and Metfornin were effectively reduced GHbAIc,while the results of Basen treatment was more efficient.Moreover,both two medicine do not stimulate the secreation of insulin and do not affect to functions of liver and renal.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3